Summary: I've started watching the Wrong Turn franchise: hillbilly slasher horror. As sequel-horror goes, not bad, at least not yet, though it looks like the mythos is already in debate.
Summary: I've started watching the Wrong Turn franchise: hillbilly slasher horror. As sequel-horror goes, not bad, at least not yet, though it looks like the mythos is already in debate.
BLOT: (20 Jan 2015 - 09:09:02 PM)
I watched, recently, half of the
In both, they left shots involving actors from the movie unblurred, but took out the others with a sledgehammer of a blur tool. Some photos are being discussed by the characters, but a few of the finer points of what they are discussing are lost. It makes for an intentional surreal moment. Since presumably the pictures not related to the actual missing persons case are possibly re-insertible, there might be a re-release that has these unblurred, but I have no idea if anyone would care to fix part 6 of a direct-to-DVD release sequel-horror.
As for the movie itself, it was ok. I would say that it was in no way objectively a great movie, even though it did have a couple of scenes—most notably the juxtaposition between the hunting of the sheriff and the hunting of the deer—that were well shot and set up a decent mood, and it handled the ironic salvation of the main character well—by becoming closer to his mutant hillbilly cannibal incest family, he is gaining humanity. It also has strictly-consensual-sex, which can be kind of odd for the genre that tends to toss rape scenes in because why not (something that is actually sort of explained in movie). Topping it off, it continues to [apparently] build up on the mythos of the Wrong-Turn-iverse, and all-in-all, still seems to care somewhat about the series, something not always true when it comes to sixth-installments.
Anyhow, had enough questions and so I pried into the first one, the only theatrical release one in the bunch, and found out that the sixth (as well as the fourth and the fifth) is a prequel, which gave me the false notion that the eponymous resort would somehow tie into the other movies. No. All the family story. The resort. News about the region. All that is dropped. What is explained is why the three "brothers" that ran around in 80s-camp make-up were meant to be taken seriously. In the original, the effects are Stan Winston Studio designs, and they are pretty damned amazing as practical masks that can take a beating as the actors run around and fight in them. By the time the budget bottoms out, the best special effects are gone, but as something like stand-ins for the originals, I get it. I even kind of respect it.
Watching the first one, I was fairly impressed. The acting is not always superb, but it works, especially in the two leads [Eliza Dushku and Desmond Harrington] and the strange mutants. The set-up is pretty simple—young sexy things are stranded in the woods after a car accident and decide to walk for help—but it gets in old cabins and pine farms and rustic gas stations (the kind that
So now I'm hooked. I want to see how one became the other, and so sat down and watched
So now I am on to the other half, the end to the original trilogy and the first two prequels. I have no idea what to expect, but I'm a little excited. See you with an update in a few days. Will the Wrong-Turn-iverse be split by conflicting
OTHER BLOTS THIS MONTH: January 2015
Written by Doug Bolden
For those wishing to get in touch, you can contact me in a number of ways
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
The longer, fuller version of this text can be found on my FAQ: "Can I Use Something I Found on the Site?".
"The hidden is greater than the seen."