BLOT: (07 Nov 2010 - 03:11:16 PM)
E-Reads posted, last Tuesday, "Defiant Pirates Rub Knuckles in the Eyes of Authors and Publishers"", latest in a line of articles on their blog about ebook pirates (being an ebook centric company, it seems like the sort of thing that would concern them). In general I recommend their blog, it has an intersting number of book and publishing topics brought up, as well as discussion of their releases. Today, though, we'll focus on this linked entry.
I left a comment on the post, as of right now the last one and I was late to the party, in which I briefly compare pirate/sharing sites and the often cited "THEY ARE DEFENDING USER RIGHTS!" stance with the explosive outcry against
I know money is part of it. File-sharing is treated as a noble way to get around those pesky fat-cat content owners with their ideas that they should get paid*. Cook Source, though, robbed a poor woman of an article and then used that article as partial justification for advertisers to give them money (apologizes for the polemic generalizations, but just to set the stakes). I also know that part of the game is responding to the concept of open information. In one case, books that would require some activity to access are being made "freer", while in the latter, the already free article is enclosed off into a tiny little paper thing. And well, the dumbass reply mentioned above? It probably had a lot to do with it, but how much different is this than your average pirate reply on why they feel perfectly justified in taking anything they want because "information longs to be free" or because "so what, I want to?" I have nothing but sympathy and understanding for the notion of wanting to be able to buy a book and not be afraid of your copy disappearing in a couple of years because a DRM server became too "costly" to maintain. But if a fraction of people who file-share books actually were buying all of those books, the book industry would never had problems to begin with.
Even BoingBoing.net took a stance defending the copyright holder in this one. Ha!
And yes, by the way, the Washington Post article does have some comments that bring up the "It cannot be theft since nothing was realy stolen, just copied" style argument, so some people are judging this in the same way as they judge other Intellectual Property incidences. I would just say a fair number are treating this as two types of things. How about it, two types of things or the same thing?
UPDATE: There were a couple of updates, which I linked to and discussed, very briefly, here.
* By most things I have seen,
LABEL(s): Copyright
BY WEEK: 2010, Week 44
BY MONTH: November 2010
BLOT: (07 Nov 2010 - 12:05:11 PM)
McSweeney's website has a series of "Open Letters to People or Entities Unlikely to Respond". On November 5, 2010, there was posted "AN OPEN LETTER TO THE HOMELESS MAN WHO WITNESSED ME TOTALLY LOSE IT LAST WEEK". The gist? Dude has a really crappy "professional meet-up" that turns out to be mostly people shatting out buzzwords about social media and using brand as though it had a capital B and they knew what they were talking about. Basically, what happens when the sort of people who use synergize on Twitter get together in real life. On the way back, the mostly broke and unemployed man is approached by a homeless guy looking for money, and our suited gentleman flips out. Throws money in the street.
Leaving aside the "How annoying is it to be begged off of...especially in a place like Huntsville where half our beggars drive around in cars until they get to their spot?", I just thought it summed up human interactions in an interesting way, and wanted to point it out.
Plus, it is a good life lesson. Not everyone who wears a suit deserves to wear a suit, and not everyone who lives on the street got there do to easily summable reasons. There is a student I know, who is working hard to get his degree, and he is homeless. He lives in his car most of the time and has a few friends who help him out. He is at the library every night working on homework. But, once you reach that stage, once he gets done, what will happen next? Even with a degree, without a mailing address or nice clothes, is he going to have that much of a chance? I don't know, but I hope so.
LABEL(s): Society
BY WEEK: 2010, Week 44
BY MONTH: November 2010
BLOT: (07 Nov 2010 - 01:56:43 AM)
It is almost 1:30am right now, and I pretty much have to be in bed by 2:00am, so this post will be written a bit more hurried than I like to write them in. This weekend (last night and today) was spent wrapping up my final class meeting for LS542, which is a Library Science class dealing with helping teachers (grade school through high school) design lesson plans and activities. I was the only non-School Medial Specialist in the room, and the only one without extensive training for handling school-aged children, so I often approached assignments with a degree of cynicism wrapped around common sense. The others tended to take them more as a delight to explore and dive within. Collages and Bulletin Boards (and hand puppets, cannot forget the hand puppets) are about as far outside of my comfort zone as I am sure discussing the deeply ironic nature of contemporary horror would be, if not outside, not altogether congruent with their own. I appreciate hand puppets—even I do not quite get the joy of Punch...—I just tend to think in user-interface and efficiency of search algorithms.
Usually, with these weekend classes, people show up a bit early. This Friday, I got there about a quarter of an hour before class started, and the room was empty. Not even the professor had showed up. I had an immediate spike of paranoia. Did I pick the wrong weekend? Was I somehow later than everyone else and the class had moved to another room? It was shocking how fast self-doubt slammed into me. I had only three hours of sleep, and not deep sleep at that. I had had an immense couple of days building up to it. I was tired, and feeling kind of vulnerable. The five minutes I waited for someone else to show up, the professor in this case, was this horribly negative moment. Stupid brain. Then, one of her first questions she asked me if I was ready to switch over to be a School Media Specialist and seemed kind of surprised when I said "No, no, I like my reference work."
I do like my reference work. Talking to Sarah about it, afterward, I told her that it was kind of like being given a series of puzzles and being asked to help find a solution. Not to solve them, usually, but to work out algorithms of solution. And then to teach those algorithms and confirm their validity. Reference librarianship is a weird thing because there are more facts than any one person can handle, but you learn to organize and set up mental paths so that you remember general arcs of motion, along with pertinent sub-arcs.
Enough with library science blather, let's move on to something more important: the TV. A few weeks ago, maybe a month+, Comcast switched just about all of their channels over to a digital tuning system. Those without some sort of DTV style tuner, and apparently one specific to Comcast, gets only about 15 channels now, including a TV Guide channel that mocks you for the programming you don't have. Since I mostly watch TV shows on DVD or through something iTunes or Amazon's Unbox, not having a ready TV full of content is not that big a deal. Except we are still paying for "cable" (limited basic) and so it comes down to the choice: do we cancel our cable subscription and get a converter and antenna, or do we upgrade our service for about $20-$40 a month and get the other channels back? I like a handful of those now missing channels—AMC, SyFy, Comedy Central, Cartoon Network/Adult Swim—but can do without the majority of them. At the same time, no real reason for us to keep paying even $15 for the Limited Basic if all we are getting are broadcast stations. We looked into the converter/antenna set, and it would run us about $100. The upgrade would quickly exceed this over a few months, but then again, the broadcast option only nets us a dozen channels while the upgrade gets back those mentioned above. I'll flip a coin, maybe.
I have 20-minutes before my self-imposed finishing of this entry, so I'll end with a quick discussion of an aggravating oops. A year ago, I was getting a handful of the various
Tonight, while doing an unrelated search, I found copies on Amazon.com, and multiple copies by several sellers, easily 1/6th what I paid for it. Sure, by what I can tell, it took several months before these showed up, but I still feel like I could have just waited an blah blah blah. To sum up, I am not that upset, and have been on the flipside of that before (one book I recently bought new but on sale has went up in value by over $100 from what I paid for it, and my
Seven minutes go, I am finishing up. Of course, it is about to 1am again as Daylight Savings Time ends, but I'm sticking to a promise since trying to stay up any later will probably result in me being facedown on my ccompter...my forehead continuously pressing the center keys until the loud beeping occurs and let's me know that I am being a bit
GOOD NIGHT, EVERYONE!!!
BY WEEK: 2010, Week 44
BY MONTH: November 2010
BLOT: (05 Nov 2010 - 06:34:50 AM)
Life lesson #1: If you feel icky before going to bed, like you really think you need a shower, take it. If not, you will wake up a half-dozen times throughtout the night going "ewwww". Spend the 15-minutes showering and the 15-minutes drying. It will be more efficient.
Life lesson #2: If you spend six to eight hours writing over 8000 words for a class, you will develop brainache. It will apparently hit about 4am in the morning, and it will hurt. It will take twice as long as a regular headache to subside, and it sucks. Remember, love your brain.
Alright, time to go to work so that I can go to school so that I can take classes all weekend so I can come back and work all day on Sunday. BUT...once this weekend is done, I think I will have said more or less goodbye to the mega-weeks of grad school. The next couple of assignments (which are the last for the semester) are going to be staggered and I only have two, theoretically less intense, classes next semester, which should be much better.
BY WEEK: 2010, Week 44
BY MONTH: November 2010
BLOT: (04 Nov 2010 - 01:10:14 AM)
I have decided to introduce a new feature, that might or might not stick, in which I discuss my various readings from the past week (roughly Wednesday to Wednesday, though some Thursday love may slip into it). The primary function of this act is to encourage me to keep up my reading regimen, by keeping it in short quanta as opposed to "how many books have I read this year?". And, well, by adding in a slight embarrassment factor, i.e. "Sorry guys, still reading
This week's readings:
Robert Smartwood (editor)'s
Ramsey Campbell's
Kenneth Hite's
Ok, and for the books I'm currently working on, we have P.G. Wodehouse's
LABEL(s): Readings
BY WEEK: 2010, Week 44
BY MONTH: November 2010
BLOT: (03 Nov 2010 - 04:58:40 PM)
This one better gets the vibe. Also, if you click and look at the full version, I kind of dig the way the fall colors manage to come through the gray. Keep fighting, hues!
BY WEEK: 2010, Week 44
BY MONTH: November 2010
BLOT: (03 Nov 2010 - 04:52:33 PM)
This photo doesn't really do it justice. It is just an amazingly gray day here. Misting rain, chilly but not quite cold temps, a slight fog. Whip out the hot chocolate children, today is the day for it.
BY WEEK: 2010, Week 44
BY MONTH: November 2010
BLOT: (01 Nov 2010 - 10:31:51 AM)
BY WEEK: 2010, Week 44
BY MONTH: November 2010
BLOT: (01 Nov 2010 - 10:29:16 AM)
BY WEEK: 2010, Week 44
BY MONTH: November 2010
BLOT: (01 Nov 2010 - 10:26:04 AM)
BY WEEK: 2010, Week 44
BY MONTH: November 2010
BLOT: (01 Nov 2010 - 10:20:10 AM)
BY WEEK: 2010, Week 44
BY MONTH: November 2010
Written by Doug Bolden
For those wishing to get in touch, you can contact me in a number of ways
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
The longer, fuller version of this text can be found on my FAQ: "Can I Use Something I Found on the Site?".
"The hidden is greater than the seen."